Russia- gate’s Totalitarian Style – Consortiumnews. Special Report: The New York Times is at it again, reporting unproven allegations about Russia as flat fact, while anyone who questions the Russia- gate groupthink faces ugly attacks, reports Robert Parry.

10/21:華和茶会民族系アンビエントlive. 告知. 10/21にn.a.s.s.とのコラボレーションで、華和茶会エスニックアンビエントliveを. · KPIX 5 CBS San FranciscoConnect With Us At KPIX 5 PROGRAM GUIDE: KPIX 5 TV Schedule WATCH: A Glimpse Inside The Working KPIX 5 Newsroom Breaking News. If there's one reason why The King of Hate/DarksydePhil is so notorious, it's that he breaks nearly every rule in the Let's Playing book and never learns. There’s a great deal of ridicule being aimed at Pat Robertson for describing the catastrophic earthquake in Haiti as God’s retribution on the country for a deal. It's 1911 when 12 year old Sophia plays all by herself in her big, creepy house with only four handmade dolls as friends. When her abusive father has finally had. Watch Courage the Cowardly Dog online with full episodes and in English for Free.

This is a list of all games for the Dreamcast video game console. There are 636 games on this list, which includes titles exclusive to North America, exclusive to.

By Robert Parry. It is a basic rule from Journalism 1. But The New York Times and pretty much the entire U. S. news media have abandoned that principle in their avid pursuit of Russia- gate. New York Times building in New York City. Photo from Wikipedia)When Russia is the target of an article, the Times typically casts aside all uncertainty about Russia’s guilt, a pattern that we’ve seen in the Times in earlier sloppy reporting about other “enemy” countries, such as Iraq or Syria, as well Russia’s involvement in Ukraine’s civil war. Again and again, the Times regurgitates highly tendentious claims by the U.

S. government as undeniable truth. So, despite the lack of publicly provided evidence that the Russian government did “hack” Democratic emails and slip them to Wiki. Leaks to damage Hillary Clinton and help Donald Trump, the Times continues to treat those allegations as flat fact. For a while, the Times also repeated the false claim that “all 1.

U. S. intelligence agencies” concurred in the Russia- did- it conclusion, a lie that was used to intimidate and silence skeptics of the thinly sourced Russia- gate reports issued by President Obama’s intelligence chiefs. Only after two of those chiefs – Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and CIA Director John Brennan – admitted that the key Jan. Clapper called “hand- picked” analysts from just three agencies, the Times was forced to run an embarrassing correction retracting the “1. But the Times then switched its phrasing to a claim that Russian guilt was a “consensus” of the U. S. intelligence community, a misleading formulation that still suggests that all 1. Times readers. The Times seems to have forgotten what one of its own journalists observed immediately after reading the Jan. Scott Shane wrote: “What is missing from the public report is what many Americans most eagerly anticipated: hard evidence to back up the agencies’ claims that the Russian government engineered the election attack.

Instead, the message from the agencies essentially amounts to ‘trust us.’”However, if that was the calculation of Obama’s intelligence chiefs – that proof would not be required – they got that right, since the Times and pretty much every other major U. S. news outlet has chosen to trust, not verify, on Russia- gate. Dropping the Attribution. In story after story, the Times doesn’t even bother to attribute the claims of Russian guilt.

That guilt is just presented as flat fact even though the Russian government denies it and Wiki. Leaks founder Julian Assange says he did not get the emails from Russia or any other government. CIA seal in lobby of the spy agency’s headquarters.

Watch Ooga Booga Online Stopwatch

U. S. government photo)Of course, it is possible the Russian government is lying and that some cut- outs were used to hide from Assange the real source of the emails. But the point is that we don’t know the truth and neither does The New York Times – and likely neither does the U. S. government (although it talks boldly about its “high confidence” in the evidence- lite conclusions of those “hand- picked” analysts). And, the Times continues with this pattern of asserting as certain what is both in dispute and lacking in verifiable evidence. In a front- page Russia- gate story on Saturday, the Times treats Russian guilt as flat fact again. The online version of the story carried the headline: “Russian Election Hacking Efforts, Wider Than Previously Known, Draw Little Scrutiny.”The Times’ article opens with an alarmist lede about voters in heavily Democratic Durham, North Carolina, encountering problems with computer rolls: “Susan Greenhalgh, a troubleshooter at a nonpartisan election monitoring group, knew that the company that provided Durham’s software, VR Systems, had been penetrated by Russian hackers months before.

It felt like tampering, or some kind of cyberattack,’ Ms. Greenhalgh said about the voting troubles in Durham.”The Times reported that Greenhalgh “knew” this supposed fact because she heard it on “a CNN report.”If you read deeper into the story, you learn that “local officials blamed human error and software malfunctions — and no clear- cut evidence of digital sabotage has emerged, much less a Russian role in it.” But the Times clearly doesn’t buy that explanation, adding: “After a presidential campaign scarred by Russian meddling, local, state and federal agencies have conducted little of the type of digital forensic investigation required to assess the impact, if any, on voting in at least 2. Russian hackers, according to interviews with nearly two dozen national security and state officials and election technology specialists.”But was the 2. Watch Sniper: Reloaded Online Forbes there. Russian meddling”? For instance, the “fake news” hysteria of last fall was actually traced to young entrepreneurs who were exploiting the gullibility of Donald Trump’s supporters to get lots of “clicks” and thus make more ad revenue.

The stories didn’t trace back to the Russian government. Even the Times discovered that reality although it apparently has since been forgotten.)‘Undermining’ American Democracy. The Jan. 6 report by those “hand- picked” analysts from CIA, FBI and the National Security Agency did tack on a seven- page appendix from 2. Russia’s RT network of seeking to undermine U.

Watch Ooga Booga Online Thesaurus

S. democracy. But the complaints were bizarre if not laughable, including the charge that RT covered the Occupy Wall Street protests, reported on the dangers of “fracking,” and allowed third- party presidential candidates to state their views after they were excluded from the two- party debate between Republican Mitt Romney and Democrat Barack Obama. Red Square in Moscow with a winter festival to the left and the Kremlin to the right. Photo by Robert Parry)That such silly examples of “undermining” American democracy were even cited in the Jan. But the report was issued amid the frenzy over the incoming Trump presidency when Democrats – and much of the mainstream media – were enlisting in the #Resistance. The Jan. 6 report was viewed as a crucial weapon to take out Trump, so skepticism was suppressed. Because of that – and with Trump continuing to alarm many Americans with his erratic temperament and his coy encouragement of white nationalism – the flimsy Russian “hacking” case has firmed up into a not- to- be- questioned groupthink, as the Times story on Saturday makes clear: “The assaults on the vast back- end election apparatus [i.

Russian interference, such as the hacking of Democratic emails and spreading of false or damaging information about Mrs. Clinton. Yet the hacking of electoral systems was more extensive than previously disclosed, The New York Times found.”In other words, even though there has been no solid proof of this “Russian interference” – either the “hacking of Democratic emails” or the “spreading of false or damaging information about Mrs. Clinton” – the Times reports those allegations as flat fact before extending the suspicions into the supposed “hacking of electoral systems” despite the lack of supporting evidence and in the face of counter- explanations from local officials. As far as the Times is concerned, the problem couldn’t be that some volunteer poll worker screwed up the software. No, it must be the dirty work of Russia!